00:00
00:00
FreezePark

53 Movie Reviews

18 w/ Responses

1 reviews is hidden due to your filters.

i put this on and was pretty excited, was liking what i was seeing, but then it ended after a minute and a half and i legitimately said out loud "...that's it?" also lol, "i made an invention!" "what is it" "it's a device" "does it work" "of course it works" A+ dialogue. the 3D stuff and the animation was good tho.

kinda weird how on all of your cartoons you get multiple pages of bad reviews (most of them you could take from) but you don't listen to any of them and just give them bullshit replies or dumb negative emojis. like there's literally a review on here right now that has genuine critiques and you just replied with "Lol". are you trying to act like you don't care? do you not think this shit needs some improvement? i think it's annoying already that this is all you do, but that isn't something you have to change, just stop doing the bare minimum of animation. you're wasting potential talent by doing these still frame, one shot, barely even on the brink of limited animation, unappealing looking cartoons. if limited animation is the style you wanna go for, that's fine, but there's still more to it than this. do different shots, change the framing of the scene for once, do different camera angles, do more drawings of the characters instead of reusing the same ones over and over, do some backgrounds with color palettes that actually make sense. you clearly like writing and voice acting, so why not make something more of substance out of that?? i really don't get why this is what you would wanna spend your time doing, there's nothing creative about this at all.

Man I gotta be honest, I can't name a single thing about this cartoon that isnt completely awkward to me. The writing, poses, voice acting, music selection, animation consistency -- everything about this is so disconnected imo

Cokenutz responds:

Thanks for the honest review but the only part of the review that confuses me is everything being disconnected. Can you elaborate?

i watched this with the sound off. it's probably funny

alicemargiela responds:

Mac Miller

Idk how i missed this, this is great

Honestly I'm pretty impressed. I liked the main characters a lot and there were some jokes that really landed, which I wasn't expecting. There were things I didn't care for, like the art style, and some of the dialogue felt weak to me at certain parts. Also I agree with Lynn that the animation is noticeably pretty inconsistent. But like overall, cool to see you guys make a pretty cohesive cartoon that's also like YOURS and isn't obviously borrowing from your influences too heavily. Excited to see more

So fuckin sick, glad I got to help out! I'm so proud of my boy Len

You've improved so much man

ok but why all the dumb spam entries? theres like 6 or 7 of them. you couldve just gotten more people or gotten the finished collaborators to do them instead of just making everything awkward by leaving them there like that. anyways this is pretty cool. i wouldve chosen Deep Deep Trouble myself but this is still neat

BrandyBuizel responds:

People dropped from the project constantly, in an effort to finish a few members pumped those scenes out(6 months past original deadline) because we couldn't get anyone new

RGPAnims responds:

With Snackers doing the majority of those spam scenes.

Male

Joined on 1/18/15

Level:
8
Exp Points:
673 / 710
Exp Rank:
> 100,000
Vote Power:
5.05 votes
Art Scouts
2
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
90,517
Blams:
3
Saves:
59
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
16
Medals:
3